The Daily Banana

WHO'S UP FOR A LAWSUIT?

UPDATE, JUNE 4, 2006

Not long ago, it became known that a former U.S. Marine is suing leftist filmaker Michael Moore. The plaintiff alleges that Mr. Moore improperly used the Marine's comments in his film "Farenheit 911".

In light of the above mentioned legal action, I decided to recycle this post once again. I believe this Marine's lawsuit may represent the thin end of a wedge through which public opinion may be moved toward acceptance of the idea that those who  openly preach hatred of our country should be made to pay for the harm they have caused others.

I understand fully that the Marine's complaint doesn't seem to address the relationship between clearly seditious speech and violence directed at our soldiers in the Middle East.  However, I believe the mere fact that Moore is being sued by an American soldier will serve to nurture the valid perception that he and those like him have a direct connection to needless American and Iraqi deaths.

We may be approaching a time when these foul smelling individuals--thousands of them-- will be forced to leave our country in order to preserve their opulent lifestyles.

Remember, you heard it here first. 

UPDATE, FEBRUARY 14, 2006

In the light of Al Gore's outrageous comments in Jetta, Saudi Arabia, and the Gary Busey / Billy Zane movie, recently released in Turkey which depicts American soldiers as heartless monsters, I thought it would be a good time to trot out this oldy but goody.

As far as this voter is concerned, Mr Gore's speech is clearly seditious. That same applies to the film mentioned above. Gore, Busey, and Zane knew full well that their less-than-truthful words and depictions are likely to incite violence toward our soldiers. I believe there's a better than even chance their acts were calculated to do that very thing.

First published in September of 05

Many have put forth the idea that there is a direct correlation between deaths of American soldiers in Iraq and people like Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan. I happen to be one who holds to that line of reasoning.

As far as I'm concerned, Moore and Sheehan have become rich by causing the deaths of our men and women overseas. These people and others like them are sitting on money which rightly belongs to the widows and orphans of American soldiers. Ms Sheehan has recently signed a lucrative deal with a firm which promotes public speakers. Moore's wealth has been estimated at forty million dollars.

How to get it?

What could be more American than a lawsuit directed at these seditious, gold-digging leaches?

Here's how you do it:

Any legal action would be best commenced by parties who have no assets, someone like the impoverished wife and family of a soldier killed by enemy combatants in Iraq. It's important that the parties bringing the law suit have no assets as this will limit if not exclude entirely the possibility of a countersuit. In other words the complainants would be able to strike their opponent without being hit in return. If I'm not mistaken, this is a legal strategy often used to good effect by scheister lawyers. Also, a poor family would present a sympathetic figure which the public would immediatly side with.

Next, you would have to secure the credible, unimpeachable testimony of at least one--more would be better-- Iraqi insurgent who would be willing to state that he has certain knowledge of Iraqis who carried out terrorist acts which resulted in the deaths of Americans. He would have to further state that these acts would not have been commited but for the fact that encouragement to commit them came from the defendent.

Lastly, you would have to pick your target. Cindy Sheehan would be best because she is a weak link in the following respects: One, she is likely to soon have considerable assets, but not so much that she could mount much of a legal defense on her own. Two, her views have been so stridently ridiculous that those who would be willing to help underwrite her defense would be lukewarm in their enthusiasm. In other words, many would keep their distance because of the insane nature of her pronouncements.

Addendum: It almost goes without saying that legal action should be commenced at the federal level in a red state. Obviously we wouldn't want this thing to end up in front of the ninth circuit.

Voila! You now have the makings of a legal strategy which has a pretty fair chance of success in my opinion. Of course the weight of my opinion is somewhat lessened by the fact that I'm not a legal professional. Maybe our pal Saije--who is a legal pro--might grace us with her thoughts on this one.

You would have to secure funding through some sort of organization set up to procure donations which would be used to pay for qualified, motivated legal counsel. The witnesses referenced above could likely be obtained through advertisements in Iraqi newspapers. although one possible hold up might be a lack of incentives to testify. I'm sure there are ways to work around that.

If you succeed in steamrolling Sheehan, Michael Moore and the rest--lots of them-- are set up like dominoes. If you lose...well, you can't lose. Any way it cuts, leftism comes out on the short end. The sight and sound of Sheehan and others on Court TV trying to defend their idiocy day after day would be a public relations disaster for the left since, as we know, their views and beliefs don't weather close scrutiny. And just imagine Sheehan's embarrasment over the source of her newly aquired wealth.

Of course, there are those who take the opposite view. They claim to believe that the President and Donald Rumsfeld are to blame for the deaths of American soldiers. Accordingly they have commenced legal actions of their own. They have even attempted to start an "Impeach George Bush" movement. As far as I know, their attempts to sue the President and Secretary of Defense have gone nowhere. The impeachment thing isn't working for them either.

Anyway, that's what I've got. It's really no more than a passing thought that has been rattling around in my brain for some time now, but I believe it's an idea which has some merit. It's a safe bet I'm not the first to think of it.

Let us know what you think.

Addendum September 21, 2005: Any attempt to sue Michael Moore et al might best be attempted in a year or two after the situation in Iraq has quieted down. At that time, the plaintiffs might have better luck procuring the testimony of potential witnesses. Since I'm not an attorney, I don't know if timeliness would then become an issue. Complaints must be filed within a certain time frame. However, if it could be shown that the plaintiffs were unaware that they had been damaged before the later filing date, that might be a mitigating factor. I'm going to repost this one every now and then. I believe that, over time, the idea might come to be seen as viable.

Jack Jones

PS. You know the drill by now. Comments are always one hundred percent open on this blog and so on and so forth...

THOUGTS ON THE CURMUDGEON CLUB (NOAM CHOMSKY, AL GORE, ET AL)

It's one thing to be an angry young man.

In America we produce more than our share, so we tend to cut them a lot of slack.

It's usually just a phase don't you know.

However, if you've ended up an angry old man, you're probably doing something wrong.

JJ

BLESS 'EM ALL

It has been said that cleanliness is next to godliness.

I'm not so sure.

Instead, I wonder if freedom--of mind and spirit--doesn't bring us closer to The One who makes all things, seen and unseen.

So on this Memorial Day, may God see fit to bless all the men and women and boys and girls in our armed forces who daily go about the work of defending and procuring what freedom we have in this world.  And may He see fit to bless the souls of those who have passed over while performing that task.

And may He someday see fit to extinguish for all time, the evil in the hearts of men which makes soldiers necessary in the first place.

THOUGHTS ON PANDA BEARS

A while back I watched a program on Animal Planet about panda bears.

My wife informs me that, while they may look all cute and cuddly, a panda bear can actually tear a person limb from limb without the slightest bit of remorse.

I chose not to argue the point.

I often choose not to argue the point.

However, I am reasonably certain that I could be pals with a panda bear.

JJ

As it turns out, satan is just a pathetic loser.

JJ

CLARIFICATION OF TERMS...MAYBE

In this blog the term "lliberal" is more or less synonomous with the terms; leftist, progressive, marxist, anarchist, communist etc.. I feel that I'm forced by convention to use these terms interchangeably even though I know that many true Liberals may take offense.

I believe that most readers of this blog factor in a certain degree of ambiguity with regard to the above terms.

That said, I should reiterate that in another time, I and those like me were thought of as Liberals. That is to say, people who believe in true equality under the law and true freedom of thought, speech and spirit. As distinct from leftists/liberals who must only claim such beliefs temporarily as a matter of convenience. You can bet that if Michael Moore or George Soros or Sean Penn--or a host of others, you know the names-- were empowered to do so, they would immediately stamp out through brutal force all of our rights which so many young men and women have died to protect.

Count on it!

Of course, they would do it for our own good.

They're very thoughtful that way.

But I digress.

Simply put. The term "liberal" has been co-opted by the left. That being the case, I don't have any choice but to use it in conjunction with their many other handles.

JJ

PS. As always, comments are open on this blog. There is no need to sign in or log in. So jump in and give us your two cents. Please be thoughtful and please be nice.

LIBERALS AS AGGRESSORS

The dirty little secret--one of them anyway--that liberals won't even admit to themselves is that their beliefs are ultimately founded on aggression.

One of the main building blocks of leftist (Progressive) methodology involves using anti-social elements within society to terrorize, confuse and destroy that society over time.

NOTE: For the purposes of this post, "anti-social elements", are defined as people who get off on, take pleasure in, or otherwise enjoy, hurting others. Pedophiles, murderers, rapists, etc... Oh, and terrorists, I almost forgot.

This is the dynamic in play when the ACLU defends groups like The North American Man Boy Love Association or NAMBLA. As the name implies, NAMBLA is an organization formed to promote the legalisation of sexual relationships between lecherous old men and young boys.

That same dynamic is in play when the ACLU defends white supremists and Neo-Nazi groups.

That, notwithstanding the occasional defense of a Rush Limbaugh.

Despite what you may have been led to believe, the ACLU, (American Civil Liberties Union) has very little to do with Americans or their civil liberties. Of course, that same applies to other related groups who share the same goal.

Remember, the end game is to destroy the underpinnings of civilization by destroying civility.

"Communism is the goal". That quote from ACLU founder Roger Baldwin.

JJ

THOUGHT PROVOKING.

"By psychopolitics our chief goals are effectively carried forward. To produce a maximum of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first most important step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil. At least a weary populace can seek peace only in our offered Communist State, at last only Communism can resolve the problems of the masses."

From an address by Lavrent Pavlovich Beria to American students at the Lenin University prior to 1936.

I think everyone should be familiar with this document because alot of things--previously inexplicable-- begin to make perfect sense when placed over the template suggested by this speech and the accompanying manual which details methods for subverting the U.S. over time from within.

It's likely that many will reflexively refuse to give any credence whatsoever to the documents referenced above--we live in a time when conspiracy theories abound.

And yet, there they are.

The manual referenced above is a historical document and is only one of many similar historical documents. Evidence of its use is only too easy to find throughout the decades leading up to the present. Again, I encourage everyone to take a few moments of their time to read it. You can link to it here and I'll leave a permanent link to in on the sidebar of The Daily Banana.

Jack Jones.

DEFINITIONS

Leftism/progressivism can be defined as an insidious, devious thought process through which certain individuals--leftists/progressives--are enabled to plot and/or carry out various evil acts against mankind, while convincing themselves that they are doing good........in the long run.

JJ

LEFTIST/PROGRESSIVE MISSION STATEMENT: CORRUPT THE YOUNG

The mission statement of the left/progressives was written by Vladimir Lenin almost one hundred years ago. It begins with the command,  "Corrupt the young..." Many have since echoed his sentiments on college campuses and in other leftist forums and publications.

The left--as defined by me--includes, but is not limited to, those who profess: Communism, Marxism, Maoism, Socialism, Anarchism, Feminism, Animal-centrism, any sort of geo or ethno-centrism and of course progressivism.

Leftism--as defined by me-- includes most of the 'isms,Capitalism, of course, being an exception. Maybe you know of some others.

It is accurate to state that the Democrat party has been entirely co-opted by the left.

You can find the entire mission statement of the left printed on the sidebar of this blog. It goes on to insist that blatant dishonesty and deciet are acceptable methods for promoting their agenda. They have been tirelessly perfecting that methodology for well over a century.

Leftists/progressives will argue that the mission statement which I cite is only a relatively painless means to some absract glorious end far in the future. But then, you would expect that since they believe that blatant dishonesty and deciet are acceptable methods for promoting their agenda.

Anyway, don't be fooled.

The means has in fact become the end.

Personally, I would think long and hard before I signed on with any ideology whose mission statement commands you to  "Corrupt the young."

Remember leftism/progressivism is nothing more than an attempt to morally justify putting base human impulses into action. Impulses like hatred or rage or wanton desire to harm others.

And just as hatred and rage and wanton desire to harm others are impervious to reason, so too leftism/progressivism is impervious to reason.

Through what sick perversion of logic can you accept the command, "Corrupt the young."?

JJ

When you boil it down, leftism is about moral justification for evil.

JJ

Ultimately, leftism is evil because it encourages humans to regress toward selfishness and lovelessness.

JJ

YOU DO HAVE A SAY

It's official! Our congress is now at war with the people of The United States of America.

Our politicians have shown that they have exactly zero regard for our lives our values and our security. They have shown us that their loyalty belongs to unscrupulous employers and those who hate our country and seek to harm us.

The good news is that each and every one of us can fight back starting today.

Begin by deciding right now that you will boycott any and all businesses which hire people who you suspect may be in our country illegally. In addition, boycott businesses which hire people who you suspect may not have the best intentions toward our nation. Don't be afraid to paint with the broadest brush possible.

Of course, this will entail avoidance of many--probably most-- fast food resturaunts, numerous landscaping and construction firms and at least one nationwide chicken processing concern.

Don't stop, your not done yet.

Finish by sending an anonymous letter directly to the businesses which you are boycotting. Be sure to tell them--politely but firmly--that they have lost your business because they have insisted on hiring people who have only disdain for the country you love. IMPORTANT: Be sure to send your letter using a fictictuous name and return address.. Our boycott will be far more effective if no specific name or organization is associated with it. In other words, if it comes directly from millions of Americans acting as individuals who care about what happens to their country. In addition, the leftist forces who seek to use illegals as a tool to harm us, can't fight what they can't see.

When many of America's businesses begin to experience severe profit loss while at the same time recieving in the mail clear statements indicating the precise reason for that profit loss, a few things will happen.

One, millions of illegal immigrants will simply pack up and go home since the businesses which employ them can no longer afford to do so.

Two, millions of expatriated South Americans returning to their home countries will cause pressure on the governments of those nations to put their respective houses in order with regard to fair and just civil and economic treatment of their own citizens.

The third result of our boycott will be that America's business community will begin to lean on Congress to enforce existing immigration laws.

Okay, that's my guaranteed solution to the problem of illegal immigration. If enough of us follow my simple and painless plan, it can't fail.

All that remains is for you to ask yourself if you care enough to put it into action.

Do you care enough to forgo that greasy burger, or that flatulence inducing burrrrrrrito? Will it really kill you to mow your own lawn? Can you wait one or two more years to have your roof replaced? Better yet, couldn't you afford to put off all constuction projects for as long as it takes?

Can you afford to be inconvenienced for the good of a nation which has given so much to the world? Can you afford to be inconvenienced in order to preserve your children's freedom in the years to come?

The way in which you choose to answer these questions may decide the kind of world we will leave to those we care about..

C'mon. You can do it! In fact, you should consider boycotting illegal immigrants your patriotic duty.

All that greasy food is bad for you anyway..

JJ

When you boil it down, leftism is about moral justification for hatred.

JJ

Hatred, anger, depression and guilt are the four pillars of leftism.

JJ

When you boil it down, leftism is about having an excuse to hate.

SEAN PENN, SADO MASOCHIST

"We violate her. There are cigarette burns in some funny places. She's a pure snake-oil salesman. She doesn't believe a word she says." (Sean Penn referring to the Ann Coulter doll he likes to torture. From the on line magazine Contact Music.)

LEFTIST NIGHTMARE

A peaceful, stable Middle East clearly brought about by policies initiated by a Republican administration is the worst thing imagineable for leftists (Communists, Socialist, Anarchists, Marxists, Progressives. Whatever we're calling them these days.) That's why we see them doing everything they possibly can to bring about a bad outcome in Iraq.

As a result, they may have foolishly mis-calculated, as those motivated by childish anger are wont to do.

Few Americans will forget the clearly seditious behaviour of those on the left or of those Democrats who have taken up their cause. Far too many Dems have made far too many statements which can't be disowned or credibly denounced. They may very well have passed the point of no return.

If things go well in Iraq, in spite of all their efforts, it may spell the end of the Democrat party in November.

Jack Jones

PS. Keep in mind, I'm not a Republican. I'm not a registered anything. As I've written before, the Republicans are the worst of all political parties--unless you include Democrats.

Leftism has always been the plaything of the rich.

Jack Jones

Leftism is a religion for people who are incapable of faith.

Jack Jones