LIBERALS AS AGGRESSORS

The dirty little secret--one of them anyway--that liberals won't even admit to themselves is that their beliefs are ultimately founded on aggression.

One of the main building blocks of leftist (Progressive) methodology involves using anti-social elements within society to terrorize, confuse and destroy that society over time.

NOTE: For the purposes of this post, "anti-social elements", are defined as people who get off on, take pleasure in, or otherwise enjoy, hurting others. Pedophiles, murderers, rapists, etc... Oh, and terrorists, I almost forgot.

This is the dynamic in play when the ACLU defends groups like The North American Man Boy Love Association or NAMBLA. As the name implies, NAMBLA is an organization formed to promote the legalisation of sexual relationships between lecherous old men and young boys.

That same dynamic is in play when the ACLU defends white supremists and Neo-Nazi groups.

That, notwithstanding the occasional defense of a Rush Limbaugh.

Despite what you may have been led to believe, the ACLU, (American Civil Liberties Union) has very little to do with Americans or their civil liberties. Of course, that same applies to other related groups who share the same goal.

Remember, the end game is to destroy the underpinnings of civilization by destroying civility.

"Communism is the goal". That quote from ACLU founder Roger Baldwin.

JJ

Comments

[Nobody]

I almost can't read political blogs anymore. People are so uninformed and can do nothing but regurgitate political spun talking points. What a shame!

[Jack Jones]

Nobody, you're not the first to accuse me of regurgitating talking points. Allow me to set the record straight. Every point I makes stems from conclusions I have reached through a lifetime of observation. I believe that any reasonably well informed person would likely reach the same conclusions through objective--key in on that word--observation. Further, I rarely hear the issues I raise being discussed in any forum. I don't know anything about any talking points and I wouldn't know where to access them. Lastly I invite you to point up any aspect of the above post which is inaccurate or indicates that I'm "uninformed".

[Larry]

If Liberals are aggressors, then what are Conservatives? Remember no talking points please!

[Jack Jones]

Larry, clearly, people who label themselves Conservatives can also harbor aggressive tendencies. However, in my experience it tends not to be hidden aggression. That is to say, they tend not to lie to themselves and others concerning their motives. Also, I'll admit that in this discussion we are somewhat boxed in by labels. Obviously, there are people who call themselves Liberals who are genuine in their beliefs. They are often used as tools by the left. Not so long ago, I would have been called a liberal. In the above post I'm writing about people like those referenced in "Two plus two equals five...". That is, people who claim concern for the poor and downtrodden but who, for instance, express a belief that the entire state of Israel should be forcibly removed to a remote island. The professor Ward Churchill would be another example you may be more familiar with. There are many such people out there and they are the ones who ultimately shape and fuel and modern leftism. I hope that answers your question. Stop by any time.

[Ryan Oddey]

SO let me get this straight, you are in favor of people being able to speak their opinion, as long as it is your opinion. You think some people deserve the right to free speach, and others do not? I am a liberal, and proud of it. I am proud because we believe in equality for all within the laws of the land, and it is unfortunate that people like yourself would rather see certain people get certain rights, and others get other rights. Let me guess, you are totally fine with the government recording all of our phone calls too? Liberals are not the agressor, they are the answer to the problems brought on by this administration.

[Jack Jones]

Ryan, after a brief review of my post and comments I can't find anything which indicates that I believe in inequality under the law. Please be more specific. Also, you're mis-informed. The government doesn't record all of our phone calls. Anyone who objectively reads your comment is likely to come away with the sense that you are an angry person. I believe this would tend to lend credence to my assertion that liberals harbor aggressive tendencies. But of course you're not a liberal Ryan. Liberals in the classic sense no longer exist. As I indicated earlier "liberal" is an ambiguous term which has lost much of its meaning. I only use it for the sake of convenience. All of the true liberals are either dead or have become Republicans. You seem to be a garden variety leftist Ryan. That is to say, someone who sees in the United States and the President, convenient focal points for his hatred, anger and yes, aggression.

[deedleballs]

Let's face it Jack, you've gone completely round the bend.